{"id":2320,"date":"2019-04-02T17:23:11","date_gmt":"2019-04-02T21:23:11","guid":{"rendered":"https:\/\/reviewsignal.com\/blog\/?page_id=2320"},"modified":"2019-11-25T01:30:55","modified_gmt":"2019-11-25T06:30:55","slug":"101-200-month-wordpress-hosting-performance-benchmarks-2019","status":"publish","type":"page","link":"https:\/\/reviewsignal.com\/blog\/101-200-month-wordpress-hosting-performance-benchmarks-2019\/","title":{"rendered":"$101-200\/Month WordPress Hosting Performance Benchmarks (2019)"},"content":{"rendered":"

The full company list, product list, methodology, and notes can be found here<\/a>.<\/p>\n

This post focuses only on the results of the testing in the $101-200\/month price bracket for WordPress Hosting.<\/p>\n

\n

Other Price Tier Results<\/h2>\n

<$25\/Month Tier<\/a>$25-50\/Month Tier<\/a>$51-100\/Month Tier<\/a>$101-200\/Month Tier<\/a>$201-500\/Month Tier<\/a>$500+\/Month (Enterprise) Tier<\/a><\/p>\n<\/div>\n

Hosting Plan Details<\/strong><\/h2>\n

\"\"<\/a><\/p>\n

Click table for full product information.<\/em><\/p>\n

Load Storm Testing Results<\/h2>\n

Load Storm is designed to simulate real users visiting the site, logging in and browsing. It tests uncached performance.
\n\"\"<\/p>\n

Results Table<\/h3>\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n<\/colgroup>\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n
Company Name<\/td>\nTotal Requests<\/td>\nTotal Errors<\/td>\nPeak RPS<\/td>\nAverage RPS<\/td>\nPeak Response Time(ms)<\/td>\nAverage Response Time (ms)<\/td>\nTotal Data Transferred (GB)<\/td>\nPeak Throughput (MB\/s)<\/td>\n\n
\n
Average Throughput (MB\/s)<\/div>\n<\/div>\n<\/td>\n<\/tr>\n
Cloudways<\/a><\/td>\n697,841<\/td>\n0<\/td>\n569.98<\/td>\n387.69<\/td>\n4,651<\/td>\n498<\/td>\n41.88<\/td>\n35<\/td>\n23<\/td>\n<\/tr>\n
Kinsta<\/a><\/td>\n723,242<\/td>\n0<\/td>\n555.97<\/td>\n401.80<\/td>\n7,926<\/td>\n390<\/td>\n44.4<\/td>\n35<\/td>\n25<\/td>\n<\/tr>\n
Liquid Web<\/a><\/td>\n569,667<\/td>\n0<\/td>\n410.28<\/td>\n316.48<\/td>\n9,236<\/td>\n1,211<\/td>\n33.72<\/td>\n24<\/td>\n19<\/td>\n<\/tr>\n
Pressable<\/a><\/td>\n798,038<\/td>\n3,036<\/td>\n608.52<\/td>\n443.35<\/td>\n15,527<\/td>\n460<\/td>\n43.59<\/td>\n34<\/td>\n24<\/td>\n<\/tr>\n
Savvii<\/a><\/td>\n649,373<\/td>\n113,950<\/td>\n501.18<\/td>\n360.76<\/td>\n14,077<\/td>\n971<\/td>\n31<\/td>\n23<\/td>\n17<\/td>\n<\/tr>\n
Servebolt.com<\/a><\/td>\n1,108,623<\/td>\n22<\/td>\n851.93<\/td>\n615.90<\/td>\n10,055<\/td>\n65<\/td>\n42.39<\/td>\n33<\/td>\n24<\/td>\n<\/tr>\n
SiteGround<\/a><\/td>\n925,645<\/td>\n2,045<\/td>\n754.25<\/td>\n514.25<\/td>\n15,102<\/td>\n608<\/td>\n33.69<\/td>\n28<\/td>\n19<\/td>\n<\/tr>\n<\/tbody>\n<\/table>\n

Discussion<\/h3>\n

Cloudways<\/a>\u00a0[Reviews<\/a>], Kinsta<\/a>, and Servebolt.com<\/a> all handled the Lost Storm test without issue.<\/p>\n

LiquidWeb<\/a>\u00a0[Reviews<\/a>] had substantially increased response times as the test went on.<\/p>\n

Pressable<\/a> showed slight response time increases and a 0.38% error rate.<\/p>\n

Savvii<\/a> did not handle the Load Storm test well.<\/p>\n

SiteGround<\/a>\u00a0[Reviews<\/a>] showed a slight 0.22% error rate.<\/p>\n

Load Impact Testing Results<\/h2>\n

Load Impact is designed to test cached performance by repeatedly requesting the homepage.
\n\"\"<\/p>\n

Results Table<\/h3>\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n<\/colgroup>\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n
Company Name<\/td>\nRequests<\/td>\nErrors<\/td>\nData Transferred (GB)<\/td>\nPeak Average Load Time (ms)<\/td>\nPeak Average Bandwidth (Mbps)<\/td>\nPeak Average Requests\/Sec<\/td>\n<\/tr>\n
Cloudways<\/a><\/td>\n850691<\/td>\n1<\/td>\n47.6<\/td>\n749<\/td>\n805<\/td>\n1720<\/td>\n<\/tr>\n
Kinsta<\/a><\/td>\n894981<\/td>\n0<\/td>\n49.75<\/td>\n624<\/td>\n815<\/td>\n1750<\/td>\n<\/tr>\n
Liquid Web<\/a><\/td>\n360870<\/td>\n0<\/td>\n20.32<\/td>\n5740<\/td>\n214<\/td>\n464<\/td>\n<\/tr>\n
Pressable<\/a><\/td>\n842967<\/td>\n0<\/td>\n47.96<\/td>\n721<\/td>\n814<\/td>\n1700<\/td>\n<\/tr>\n
Savvii<\/a><\/td>\n688233<\/td>\n30<\/td>\n38.4<\/td>\n1820<\/td>\n500<\/td>\n1070<\/td>\n<\/tr>\n
Servebolt.com<\/a><\/td>\n1092189<\/td>\n29<\/td>\n61.27<\/td>\n561<\/td>\n938<\/td>\n1070<\/td>\n<\/tr>\n
SiteGround<\/a><\/td>\n877152<\/td>\n27<\/td>\n48.83<\/td>\n666<\/td>\n794<\/td>\n1990<\/td>\n<\/tr>\n<\/tbody>\n<\/table>\n

Discussion<\/h3>\n

Cloudways, Kinsta, Pressable, Servebolt.com, and SiteGround all handled the Load Impact test without issue.<\/p>\n

LiquidWeb showed significant signs of load with increased response times but zero errors.<\/p>\n

Savvii showed significantly increased response times.<\/p>\n

Uptime Monitoring Results<\/h2>\n

\"\"<\/p>\n

Results Table<\/h3>\n\n\n\n\n\n<\/colgroup>\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n
Company Name<\/td>\nUptimeRobot<\/td>\nStatusCake<\/td>\nStatusCake Avg Response Time<\/td>\n<\/tr>\n
Cloudways<\/td>\n100<\/td>\n100%<\/td>\n0.535s<\/td>\n<\/tr>\n
Kinsta<\/td>\n100<\/td>\n100%<\/td>\n0.346s<\/td>\n<\/tr>\n
Liquid Web<\/td>\n100<\/td>\n100%<\/td>\n0.552s<\/td>\n<\/tr>\n
Pressable<\/td>\n100<\/td>\n99.96%<\/td>\n0.828s<\/td>\n<\/tr>\n
Savvii<\/td>\n99.988<\/td>\n100%<\/td>\n0.462s<\/td>\n<\/tr>\n
Servebolt.com<\/td>\n100<\/td>\n100%<\/td>\n0.359s<\/td>\n<\/tr>\n
SiteGround<\/td>\n99.991<\/td>\n99.99%<\/td>\n0.465s<\/td>\n<\/tr>\n<\/tbody>\n<\/table>\n

Discussion<\/h3>\n

The lowest uptime was a hair under 99.99% which is amazing for everyone.<\/p>\n

WebPageTest.org Results<\/h2>\n

WebPageTest fully loads the homepage and records how long it takes from 11 different locations around the world.<\/p>\n

Results Table<\/h3>\n
<\/canvas><\/div>\n